I also think it's a much needed idea. I'd be happy to do some contributing
too, but like Harry, will need my contributions looked over by experts!
iain
On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 4:44 PM, Andrew C <countfuzzball(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hiya Harry,
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 12:31 AM, Harry van Haaren
<harryhaaren(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I think some "beginner" coding
documentation on Linux Audio would be a
great
asset to the community, and I'm willing to
contribute to such an effort.
As
Robin Gareus mentioned in another thread, a
"FLOSS" manual is probably
the
best way to go for a community effort on
documenting.
I rather like this idea, for what it's worth.
"if
you think it should be thought that way write the tutorial"... the
downside
of this is that if one tutorial uses toolkit
<X> and the next toolkit
<Y>,
the average beginning coder is going to get lost
in implementation
details
and that defeats the purpose of documentation :D
Easier said than done, but why not use the most popular toolkits for
each tutorial, that way you can follow each tutorial using whichever
toolkit you want.
Andrew.
(hurray for me ignoring the amount of work the above statement would
involve, but it's an idea.)
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev