27 Jan
2007
27 Jan
'07
4:59 p.m.
Robert Jonsson <rj(a)spamatica.se> writes:
On Saturday 27 January 2007 06:47, Loki Davison
wrote:
nothing? i'm aware of 3 hosts that can host lv2 plugins. maybe there are
others i'm not aware of.
--
Nedko Arnaudov <GnuPG KeyID: DE1716B0>
On 1/27/07, Fraser <fraser(a)arkhostings.com>
wrote:
And why should you code for a plugin standard that nothing supports?
Besides, is LV2 even finished?
Suggesting that LADSPA is deprecated is a bit of a stretch. It may not be
perfect, but it's well supported.
Hi All,
I've been converting my old VST plugins over to LADSPA and have come
across something in the api which I really miss - the inability separate
the algorithmic to the displayed value of a parameter.
I'm finding this inability is leading to non-ideal programming habits.
why are you coding new stuff for a depreciated system? Why not LV2?