10 Sep
2004
10 Sep
'04
2:45 p.m.
Lee Revell <rlrevell(a)joe-job.com> writes:
Are there any known issues with the code that the
kernel guys might
bring up? Seems like it has been stable for a while. The only thing I
notices was that the indentation doesn't follow the recommended kernel
style.
It meets the recommendations I know about. If you point out specific
problems, I'll fix them.
I found your original RFC post to the LSM mailing
list, I was thinking
of including a pointer to that, as everything in there still seems to
apply.
Good idea.
Also, I assume you are not referring to sourceforge
CVS, because I
looked and there aren't any Kconfig patches. Can you commit this to SF
CVS so I can check it out?
That was a working directory. I never committed it because I haven't
figured out a good way to maintain the patches over successive kernel
versions. It doesn't belong in CVS. When I tried it with 2.6.8.1,
the patch failed to apply.
Anyway let me know when you have a patch you are
comfortable submitting
for inclusion in the kernel and I will go ahead and post it.
I am working up a new patch for 2.6.8.1 and testing it today. I'll
send you a copy as soon as it is clean.
--
joq