13 Jul
2011
13 Jul
'11
1:31 a.m.
On Tuesday 12 July 2011 22:20:48 Olivier Guilyardi wrote:
On 07/12/2011 09:45 PM, Chris Cannam wrote:
You mean there should be a barrier to discussions about memory barriers?
Sorry, couldn't resist...
Thinking it over and going back over some
references and earlier
threads here (e.g. much earlier ones from Olivier et al) it does seem
that this should be enough. This particular situation isn't so
complicated after all. I think the more I read earlier during this
thread (and reading around) generally about memory ordering, the more
I was beginning to feel as if the entire subject was a source of only
trouble.
Quite interestingly, I have noticed that discussions about memory barriers
are often somehow endless.