27 Jul
2004
27 Jul
'04
3:51 p.m.
On Tue, Jul 27, 2004 at 12:33:56PM -0400, Paul Davis wrote:
do you mean the sdk distributed by berkeley? if you're speaking about
libOSC++ from stetson university (part of the wiretap project), it
doesn't wrap the berkeley thing. when using the "fraunhofer" branch
from cvs, it comes with some classes wrapping the unix network stuff
(UDP and TCP).
if you don't need bundles, I'd go with liblo, cause it's really
lightweight.
bests,
martin
The question
is, which implementation is best? All I can find is
Steve's liblo, libosc++, and the 'official' OSC kit. What are the
afaik, libosc++ just wraps the sdk distributed by stanford. and that
sdk is just a total nightmare. the 2nd worst code i have ever
read. use liblo.