Jens M Andreasen wrote:
On Tue, 2010-04-13 at 00:55 +0100, James Morris wrote:
A string of note-ons following each other all for
the same pitch n without
any intervening note-offs for pitch n, IS PERFECTLY ACCEPTABLE provided
they are INTENTIONAL and NOT accidental.
Yes, except for that this is an absurdity that could only happen by
accidental programming.
Are you trying to assert that absurdities (and accidental programming)
do *not* happen quite often in music? ;-)
To quote from the GS standard:
| Address: 40 1x 14, Parameter: ASSIGN MODE,
| 0 = SINGLE, 1 = LIMITED-MULTI, 2 = FULL-MULTI
|
| Single: If the same note is played multiple times in succession, the
| previously-sounding note will be completely silenced, and then the new
| note will be sounded.
|
| LimitedMulti: If the same note is played multiple times in succession,
| the previously-sounding note will be continued to a certain extent
| even after the new note is sounded. (Default setting)
|
| FullMulti: If the same note is played multiple times in succession,
| the previously-sounding note(s) will continue sounding for their
| natural length even after the new note is sounded.
|
| * ASSIGN MODE is the parameter that determines how voice assignment
| will be handled when sounds overlap on identical note numbers in the
| same channel (i.e., repeatedly struck notes).
IIRC the XG standard has a similar parameter.
Regards,
Clemens