26 Jul
2012
26 Jul
'12
8:07 p.m.
On 07/26/2012 07:00 PM, Florian Paul Schmidt wrote:
On 07/26/2012 06:51 PM, Julien Claassen wrote:
You'll want angular dependent convolution
https://ccrma.stanford.edu/~jos/doppler/dafx02.pdf
CCRMA has more publications on that matter.
Hello everyone! I have just asked myself, if it
is a good idea to
use an IR of a Leslie for simulating a Leslie. Correct me, if I'm
bloody stupid, but working on the basics of convolution, it
doesn't look promising. Since you take the IR of the Leslie and
then apply the full IR to each sample, meaning, that you might
get more of a whirling reverb? Or is there another technique, to
apply an IR and cycles. Just one "sample" of the IR to one sample
of the input signal. If I am completely wrong, a simple no will
suffice. My knowledge of this is basic. I've only got some
knowledge from a lecture called "signal theory' to back me up and
it should probably be called "an introduction to" or "basics of"
at that. :-) Warm regards Julien
Convolution with a constant convolution kernel (constant over
time) gives you the response of a time-invariant system to the
input signal. A Leslie is clearly not time-invariant..
Flo