29 Apr
2012
29 Apr
'12
5:19 p.m.
Am Sonntag, den 29.04.2012, 11:07 -0400 schrieb Paul Davis:
On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 10:41 AM, hermann
<brummer-(a)web.de> wrote:
But he fail already by notify people of there rights.
How could one say if there are modifications ?
Anyhow, for sure there is GPL'd software included, witch is modified,
and isn't available at a online location.
He claim it as a modified slackware "OS" build.
Is anyone here on the list knowing what is to do
now, what could we do
to make the provider aware that he must offer the source in the same way
then the binary's,
this part is not quite true. its generally accepted that as long as
the source is freel available from an identifiable online location,
then notifying people who received the binaries of their rights and
the location from which the source can be obtained is sufficient *if
there are no modifications*