6 Mar
2010
6 Mar
'10
7:04 a.m.
Hi,
On Fri, 2010-03-05 at 10:16 -0600, Josh Lawrence wrote:
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 4:43 AM, Gerald Mwangi
<gerald.mwangi(a)gmx.de> wrote:
Sorry I'm just in the middle of a production, and had to explode a
litte. I was experimenting with a lot of synths and found those to be
usefull, which aren't in plugin format.
Hi, does anyone know a synth powerfull like
zynadd, phasex or
bristol,but in dssi format? I need something I can load into Rosegarden,
since I dont want 10 Standalones running, until ardour, rg and the
synths support LASH, if that ever happens.
I have no idea why, but I have a warm, fuzzy soft place in my heart
for DSSI plugins. they always seem to just work. whysynth has
already been mentioned, but be sure to check out the calf monosynth,
which can be run as a DSSI plugin:
jack-dssi-host calf.so:Monosynth
check out the DSSI home page too, for a lot of other options.
I'm hoping this thread will reveal some that I don't know about! we
really need something like specimen in DSSI format.
I think LASH should be integrated into Jack, to
make it mandatory for
linux audio apps. The missing LASH support is one of the main issues
disturbing me, when working with linux audio. Now I've said it, ha.
I'm thinking of having Jack require a Load/Save callback, prior to
activating the client. How feasible is that?
why oh why oh why did you throw this paragraph in?
now no one wants
to talk about DSSI anymore... :(