4 Jan
2015
4 Jan
'15
11:07 p.m.
On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 4:30 PM, Aurélien Leblond <blablack(a)gmail.com> wrote:
As far as I can see I have 2 options:
- Port the code to the c++11 standard - but you seem to think that's a bad
idea
- Compile this plugin with C99 - that's the solution I have in the git
at the moment but I get the warning "cc1plus: warning: command line
option ‘-std=c99’ is valid for C/ObjC but not for C++ [enabled by
default]" and call me pedantic but I don't like warnings!
C99 is a *C* language standard, not a C++ language standard. There seems to
be some confusion here over what language the code you're trying to compile
really is.
Is it C? Then C99 is appropriate but need a few tweaks. c++11 would not be
appropriate.
Is it C++? Then C++11 is an option but is also relatively new, and so may
or may not be appropriate. C99 is not appropriate for C++ code.