5 Mar
2010
5 Mar
'10
7:20 a.m.
If you can finance LASH development by giving jobs to 2-3 dedicated coders -
it might be a good way to force it. Other than that I am not sure.
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 2:08 PM, Gerald Mwangi <gerald.mwangi(a)gmx.de> wrote:
Hi, maybe you can enlighten me on the alternatives.
It just seems to me that the majority of audio devs, simply don't seem
to care about session management. So my idea is just to force them to.
Gerald
On Fri, 2010-03-05 at 13:47 +0300, alex stone wrote:
I disagree with LASH inclusion in jack itself.
There is work going to consider alternatives at the moment.
Alex.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev