8 Apr
2006
8 Apr
'06
5:07 p.m.
On 4/6/06, Esben Stien <b0ef(a)esben-stien.name> wrote:
"Patrick Stinson"
<patrickkidd.lists(a)gmail.com> writes:
The last time I looked into supercollider, I was turned on by
qualities like "mature", "reliable", "interface", and
"music". I also
recall quickly becoming confused by having to put together networks
and stuff like that, not finding instructions to do so, and the whole
model sounding rather static, as opposed to incredibly dynamic and
unpredictable, which is what I'm trying to do. I found the same
prejudice with CSound and orchestra files. I hope, and am somewhat
certain, that my prejudices are founded on ignorance. Yes? No?
music engine
SuperCollider[1]
[1]http://www.audiosynth.com/
--
Esben Stien is b0ef@e s a
http://www. s t n m
irc://irc. b - i . e/%23contact
[sip|iax]: e e
jid:b0ef@ n n
Steve McConville <mcconville.steve(a)gmail.com> to
paul, A
More options Apr 6 (2 days ago)
Have you already considered Csound5 (with the new API and python
bindings)? And if so, what is it lacking for your needs?
I found the same problem with CSound5. comments?
--
Patrick Kidd Stinson
http://www.patrickkidd.com/
http://pkaudio.sourceforge.net/
http://pksampler.sourceforge.net/