15 May
2004
15 May
'04
7:12 a.m.
On Fri, 14 May 2004 20:15:39 +0100
Steve Harris <S.W.Harris(a)ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote:
On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 05:08:53 +0100, Mike Rawes
wrote:
Fair enough. My gripe about the label is that it can be used as an
identifier (together with the filename), which can break things. So long
as there's only one identifier in 2.x I'm happy!
-
Myk
Minor nitpick regarding what is carried over as
metadata from 1.x:
Can we get rid of the label? - I never did see the use for it. The
ID is sufficient for identifying plugins, and the name (as metadata)
for presenting in a UI.
Actually I'd like to get rid if the UID (its useless for generated
plugins and has a significant adminstrative overhead) and just roll it
into the label with a URI scheme.
that way everyone can administer thier own unique ID scheme.