19 Jan
2004
19 Jan
'04
6:51 a.m.
On Sun, Jan 18, 2004 at 07:01:54 -0500, Dave Robillard wrote:
Yes, I thought I had a use case for it, but in retrospec its just hard to
get right.
- Steve
A useful
extension to this could be that too adjacent 'hidden' ports with
the same name should be connected.
Eg. if you have a plugin with a hidden 'sync' port output connected to a
plugin with a hidden 'sync' input port they should be connected by the
host.
For the record, the idea of hosts automagically connecting things seems
a little sketchy to me...