4 Mar
2004
4 Mar
'04
11:32 a.m.
On Thu, Mar 04, 2004 at 03:57:32 +0100, Dr. Matthias Nagorni wrote:
On Thu, 4 Mar 2004, Uwe Koloska wrote:
RDF is very simple - RDF syntax and RDF Schema may be complex, but RDF is
not.
In any case all of this is wrapped by the lrdf library. I can understand
the objection to another library though :)
- Steve
isn't the right thing to do to use the RDF
metatadata?
The combination of the very simple LADSPA api with something as
complicated as RDF seems a bit odd to me. I would wish if there was a
simpler solution.