15 Jun
2006
15 Jun
'06
5:32 a.m.
On 6/15/06, Kjetil S. Matheussen <kjetil(a)ccrma.stanford.edu> wrote:
Phil Frost:
there is also chuck, that nobody has
mentionned, I think :
http://soundlab.cs.princeton.edu/research/chuck/
I am in no way as experienced as most people on this list for audio
programming, but I don't see why C/C++ should be the only way to write
software to handle audio stream, neither do I see why GC would be the
only useful feature. For example, having language constructs to
explicitely handle "time line" sounds like a good idea to me, and it
looks like both Faust and chuck enable that.
David
Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] Writing LADSPA
plugins in high level
language?
To: The Linux Audio Developers' Mailing List
<linux-audio-dev(a)music.columbia.edu>
Message-ID: <20060614132522.GA3483(a)unununium.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Wed, Jun 14, 2006 at 07:47:36AM +0200, Alex Polite wrote:
The realtime extension for snd (scheme-like language) is another:
http://www.notam02.no/arkiv/doc/snd-rt/
Here is a cool alsa softsynth written in that system:
http://ccrma.stanford.edu/~kjetil/220c/ Hi there.
Is it possible to write LADSPA plugins in anything but C/C++? I prefer
perl, ruby or python.
alex
Anything but C/C++, yes. See FAUST [1], a compiled language designed
specificly for processing audio streams. Perl, Ruby, or Python, not
really.
[1] <http://faudiostream.sourceforge.net/>