2 Sep
2015
2 Sep
'15
9:35 p.m.
On Wed, 2 Sep 2015 21:17:43 +0200
Luis Garrido <luis(a)vagar.org> wrote:
On 02/09/15 21:04, Joakim Hernberg wrote:
Well yes, I'm aware of that and it was this extra latency that I wanted
to ascertain. What puzzles me is that each time the jack server is
invoked, it will need a different amount of latency compensation even
when no other parameters have changed.
I'll read that thread and it's links again, but IIRC they don't hold
the answer to my query.
--
Joakim
Maybe not a huge problem and I suppose I'll
set the latency
compensation somewhere in the middle of the results, but still I'm
curious of the mechanism behind this phenomena.
USB devices add some extra buffering, check out this thread:
http://jack-audio.10948.n7.nabble.com/Differences-in-latency-between-USB-an…