10 Oct
2011
10 Oct
'11
9:37 p.m.
On 10/10/2011 09:31 PM, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 09:08:51PM +0200, Robin Gareus
wrote:
OOPS. I misread the question. The answer is No.
The explanation is correct:
>
> All scheduling is preemptive: if a process with a higher static
> priority becomes ready to run, the currently running process will be
> preempted and returned to the wait list.
Now you have me confused ! Why 'no' ? Surely 50 > 49 ?
I've already corrected this with some off-list email with Michael.
Just Forget the the last follow up mail... - I somehow s/interrupt/ be
interrupted/ in my mind when re-reading. The original email is correct.
ciao,
robin
And would (b) a SCHED_RR/50 thread interrupt a running
SCHED_FIFO/49
thread?
yes.