8 Apr
2005
8 Apr
'05
5:49 p.m.
On Fri, 2005-04-08 at 12:45 -0700, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
On Fri, 2005-04-08 at 12:31, Jack O'Quin wrote:
Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
<nando(a)ccrma.stanford.edu> writes:
Sigh... again? :-[ :-{ :-<
Hmmm, I'm getting really confused, I thought
that the realtime lsm was
the one that was in 'mm (maybe none of them are?). Finally I found the
followup article on lwn that mentioned this:
http://lwn.net/Articles/121887/
"...The end result is that the rlimit patch has come back out of -mm..."
Maybe it was put back again afterwards? (this was reported on February
10). Hard to follow all that's happening...
Difficult and frustrating.
The kernel developers have decided not to merge the realtime-lsm,
after all. Instead, they propose an rlimits extension for
granting
per-user realtime scheduling privileges. This does (barely) meet our
minimum needs.
I have not followed the details, I presume this could be per-group,
right? What are the details on how use will be controlled, if you care
to comment (PAM?)? You would not have a thread url by chance? From the patch in my last mail:
http://www.uwsg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0503.1/1921.html
Lee