21 Jan
2003
21 Jan
'03
5:26 a.m.
On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 06:17:40 +0100, David Olofson wrote:
On Tuesday 21 January 2003 05.09, David Olofson
wrote:
I'd say that has different semantics, and so should be a seperate event.
Say... SET ;)
So, it seems like we'll need that 0 test
anyway. It should
obviously apply the target value instantly, so that later events
will work even if they land at the same timestamp. It doesn't have
to set the delta at all, as sending a 0 duration means you *have*
to send another event with the same timestamp anyway.
Another idea:
Since we need that (duration == 0) test anyway, why not have it
explicitly stop ramping as well, so we can connect non-ramped outputs
to ramped inputs and vice versa? This doesn't interfere with normal operation, and
it seems rude and
pointless to enforce ramping on all FP ins and outs, just to
guarantee punishment if you break the rules while ramping. :-)
Sure.
- Steve