2 Aug
2009
2 Aug
'09
7:37 p.m.
On Sunday 02 August 2009 17:28:01 keller wrote:
On Aug 2, 2009, at 1:53 PM, Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote:
Yes.
Raymond
keller wrote:
As I am hearing now then, I can use install4j as long as I provide the
install4j script (but not install4j itself) in the source repository.
Is that correct?
On Aug 2, 2009, at 12:50 PM, Raymond Martin
wrote:
as stated in another mail, this is hogwash. you are perfectly entitled
to chose whatever build tool you want, without having to redistribute
it. just be careful that all the third-party software you include has
the original build files included. I am referring to the Launch4J scripts to build
an executable and
others.
For example, you have an .exe for windows, isn't Launch4J what was
used?
If so, there is a script for it, as indicated in the build.xml.
As stated before, launch4j is a commercial product that I was using
on
a trial version. There is no way that I can provide that. I was
considering buying it if worked well, but even then, I cannot provide
it.
All it does is wrap the .jar file and other dirs to make it
convenient
for the users to install and launch. So I guess you're saying it's
not
allowed?