6 Aug
2009
6 Aug
'09
11:53 p.m.
PS:
Paul Davis wrote:
The context for the Netherlands is, you need to quote correctly:
2009/8/6 Ralf Mardorf
<ralf.mardorf(a)alice-dsl.net>et>:
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_General_Public_License
http://lwn.net/Articles/61292/ Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote:
citations? references? google fu magic?
[snip]
all this means that if somebody uses GPL'd code without releasing
under
GPL him/herself, s/he is in breach of contract with the original
author(s). it *does* *not* *mean* that you can now assume the entire
package is up for grabs under the terms of the GPL.
IANAL, but with a certainty of 99,9% this is the actual state of
affairs
how German courts does accept/fit the GPL to the German law and it
seems
to be the same for the Netherlands,
and it seems to be the same for the Netherlands,
because of a similar
copyright law that someone from the list described