5 Feb
2003
5 Feb
'03
12:01 p.m.
On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 01:51:03 +0200, Sami P Perttu wrote:
Yes, it might be nice to hint them, but its not neccesary.
Expect is too weak a word. I would regard a filter that (only) offered
linear frequency modulation as broken.
- Steve
You still need
WET and DRY, even if you have mixing.
True... sorry, I have confused DRY with the value (not control) that tells
what to multiply previous output buffer contents with. The host cannot do
that if more than two output buffers are the same. DRY, on the other
hand, is supposed to be the input gain. WET and DRY actually have nothing
to do with mixing in this context - wouldn't the user rather provide them? Linear pitch
(logartihmic frequency) is just what people expect. When you
modulte the cutoff of a filter (for example) you expect it to modulate
logarithmicly.
That is no answer. What do people's expectations have to do with it? We
are discussing a plugin API here. Or are you saying that logarithmic
interpolation gives better sounding results than piece-wise linear
approximation of the same with a segment length of, say, 64 samples?