10 Jul
2011
10 Jul
'11
5:08 p.m.
On 07/03/2011 12:27 AM, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
On Sat, Jul 02, 2011 at 11:02:27PM +0200, rosea
grammostola wrote:
After spending a week using JackSession, I don't think a
quit-without-save option should be a 'showstopper' here Fons. Especially
because JackSession makes working with JACK so much easier. Better to
have JackSession without a quit-without-save option, then no JackSession
at all.
My 2 cents
\r
Next thing what would be good to have imo is a
good software mixer with
JackSession support. Unfortunately non-mixer is not a good candidate
afaik, cause it changes port names. I don't know if Fons is still busy
with his mixer and if he has explored and made up his mind about the
actual implementation of the JackSession API already.
As to Jack Session support,
I won't even consider it as long
as it doesn't support quit-without-save. The rationale for not
supporting this is IMNSHO completely bogus. I just can't imagine
any app that a) can't do this, and b) can't be modified easily
to do it. 'Easily' here means requiring a fraction of the effort
to support Jack Session at all. I've got some other gripes with
Jack Session as well, but these have been discussed (or at least
presented) before.