16 Dec
2006
16 Dec
'06
10:31 a.m.
On Friday 15 December 2006 21:24, Jens M Andreasen wrote:
On Fri, 2006-12-15 at 22:00 +0200, Jussi Laako wrote:
Can you post a link to the story? A quick search didn't find it here..
Flo
--
Palimm Palimm!
http://tapas.affenbande.org
Jens M Andreasen wrote:
Yes, but the pathces are introduced and applied a bit at the time for
each official kernel version. At 2.6.19 we can read mingo's own comment
over at slashdot that 'now 50% has gone in'. Friend of order would like
to what half of which is accepted and why. Now that mingo's (et al) RT patches are
coming into mainstream, what is
the corporate rationale behind it and the running order of urgency?
I am fishing for some information on; if it is the disk-drives, the
network drivers, the usb stack or something else that I am too ignorant
to have noticed?
What worries me the most, is corner-cases on network, blocking multiple
cpu's.
Isn't the functionality conditional and selected at configure time? I
wouldn't be too worried about it. It also forces broken drivers to be
fixed which is only a good thing. This is a bit similar to the situation
when kernel pre-emption was introduced.