23 Sep
2016
23 Sep
'16
3:56 p.m.
On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 4:42 AM, Tito Latini <tito.01beta(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 04:36:17PM -0500, Paul Davis
wrote:
I respectfully think you don't understand the technical problem.
[ description ]
and yet ... no such protocol exists.
so it must all be very easy, particularly the part about gaining widespread
adoption, and yet nobody has done it, despite 30 years of protocols like
MIDI Clock, MIDI timecode, LTC and more.
puzzling, eh?
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 4:27 PM, Tito Latini
<tito.01beta(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 12:49:42PM -0500, Paul
Davis wrote:
across a network? with multiple tempo masters? The innovation is defining an API and protocol
based on 3 concepts:
tempo synchronization
an integral to get the position with the new bpm