23 May
2010
23 May
'10
10:51 a.m.
On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 08:52:16AM +1000, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
I really don't think any modification is
necessary.
At least one: the sample rate value in the header must
remain the same.
The 'canonical' way to obtain the required result would
be to modify the input file's header to reflect the real
(and wrong) samplerate before it is resampled, then resample
it to the exact required rate.
Ciao,
--
FA
O tu, che porte, correndo si ?
E guerra e morte !