28 Jan
2008
28 Jan
'08
9:15 a.m.
On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 01:53:29PM -0500, Dave Robillard wrote:
On Fri, 2008-01-25 at 16:15 +0100, Fons Adriaensen
wrote:
No, it reminds me because of the wording. I guess I've grown to
be allergic to any statements of the form
"You are not a true Communist/Christian/Moslim/American/..."
as if the writer, waving some canonical document or little book,
would be able to judge about that.
It's part of the typical "us and them" way of thinking, which is
usually a source of misery only.
Ciao,
--
FA
Laboratorio di Acustica ed Elettroacustica
Parma, Italia
Lascia la spina, cogli la rosa.
On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 09:15:35PM +0100, Esben
Stien wrote:
Because you're trolling? :) But that's really the funny thing here. Your
software isn't from the
free/open source software communities. It doesn't conform to neither
the free software definition nor the open source definition.
I'm glad that GPLv3 fixes this issue, cause if you state that the
software is under GPLv3 you may not impose any further restrictions on
the work, if I read the license correctly.
Dio mio. Why does this remind me of Revolutionary Guards
rhetoric from the Cultural Revolution era (People's
Republic of China, mid 1960s) ?