24 Feb
2011
24 Feb
'11
10:58 p.m.
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 04:12:58PM -0500, Paul Davis wrote:
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 3:45 PM, Fons Adriaensen
<fons(a)linuxaudio.org> wrote:
Unfortunately, I don't think so. Or you have other reasons
for not providing the sort of functionality that is needed.
Without a single exception, everyone involved in this sort of
work (classic or more generally, 'acoustic' music recording
and editing) that I've shown Ardour to has said more or less
the same thing: 1. it can't do it, or at best in a very clumsy
way, and 2. it's a marvellous program otherwise, and it would
probably take very little to solve its obvious problems.
Not my words, but I do agree with them.
--
FA
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 12:39:04PM -0500, Paul
Davis wrote:
unfortunately, your conclusion would be wrong. the position that i take with N-point editing is
not that there is
some other way to do "the following". There isn't. its that the way of
approaching the task that leads to needing to do "the following" is
rooted in an older way of thinking about the overall workflow.
The only conclusion I can arrive at from this, and despite lots
of effort to avoid it, is that you don't have a clue as to what
is involved in editing e.g. classic music recordings.