4 Feb
2003
4 Feb
'03
8:50 a.m.
On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 07:15:07 -0500, Taybin Rutkin wrote:
On Tue, 4 Feb 2003, Steve Harris wrote:
Agreed, for RT operation then 1494 is probably the way to go, but when you
dont care about latency (or quality*) MAS is good too.
* IIRC MAS silently resamples, so I wouldn't use it in my studio. It would
be fine for playing mp3s though.
- Steve
MAS itsself its not suitable for RT audio*, but I
suggested that we might
want some MAS<->JACK interfaces for network transparent audio, and left a
bussiness card, they seemed enthusiastic, but I never heard back from the
MAS guys.
Yes, I spoke to them too at LinuxWorld and thought that a MAS driver for
Jack would be a pretty neat thing, if one didn't care so much about
network latency.