18 Dec
2002
18 Dec
'02
9:51 a.m.
On Wed, Dec 18, 2002 at 12:47:21 +0100, David Olofson wrote:
On Wednesday 18 December 2002 11.16, Steve Harris
wrote:
[...]
OK, I'd have to construct an inner loop to see which was cleaner, but I
wont be happy with the API until I've tried coding against it anyway.
I think this is an open issue.
- Steve
I dont see any point in having anythign other
than ramp, and
/maybe/ set, but it just seems like a ramp with a duration of 0 to
me.
Yeah - but that's a special case on the receiving end. SET allows you
to test for zero duration when sending events. (I've explained
elsewhere why I think that's a good idea.)