2 Dec
2007
2 Dec
'07
6:24 p.m.
On Sun, 2007-12-02 at 23:02 +0100, Lars Luthman wrote:
So if everyone agrees that the header should be
{
uint32_t timestamp_int;
uint32_t timestamp_frc;
uint16_t size;
uint16_t type;
}
with data padded to 4+N*16 bytes, can't we just say that the code part
is done? Whether the different events types are implemented as aligned
platform-dependent structs or raw packed bytes or something else doesn't
matter at all to the event transport extension and it doesn't make any
sense to argue about it until we actually have a fixed way of sending
events.
Agreed (enough digression and nitpicking!). What's in the payload
doesn't matter (and everything is nicely aligned anyway).
Does everyone like this event header?
-DR-