23 Jan
2003
23 Jan
'03
7:25 a.m.
On Wed, 22 Jan 2003, Paul Davis wrote:
the question or the answer?
and how well does pd handle moving 9-18MB/sec through its interaction
with an audio interface? ie. the read/write access model requires lots
of extra data copying.
I dont understand what you are talking about. Someone at the pd-dev list
perhaps knows.
All I know is that I get very descent realtime performance in pd as a
normal user (even when running locate, starting new programs, etc. at
the same time). I cant get that sort of performance with jack.
Have you tried k_jack now by the way? I'm not making jokes about its
performance.
--
for myself, because its already possible to run pd as
a JACK client,
the only interesting thing that i see in this effort is a push to ask
the question: does pd in fact run much better than JACK at the same
latency/buffer settings, and if so, why?
Oops, sorry for not making that question clear. I thought it was
obvious actually.