11 Jun
2008
11 Jun
'08
6:47 a.m.
Den Tuesday 10 June 2008 21.12.32 skrev Malte Steiner:
I read that, pretty bold statement. Dont see that SEQ24 is that
unoptimized, I think its rather good.
I've never thought of seq24 as unoptimized until this guy wrote about it.
Anyway. I'm happy as long as things work ok. It doesn't have to be 100% in
all aspects.
I just stumbled upon the Non Sequencer, which seems to
be nice for
live performance as well: http://non.tuxfamily.org/
About seq24.
http://non.tuxfamily.org/MANUAL.html
7. Sister Projects
3'd section I wonder why the creator didn't
jump onboard seq24 and improved it. Typical open source behaviour, but
maybe he is heading in another direction.
It looks quite similar to Freewheeling (and he gives credit to the
freewheeling devs) and I like the look and feel of freewheeling so I'll give
Non a spin to see how it works.
/bengan