8 Dec
2002
8 Dec
'02
7:16 a.m.
Uggh, can we
keep the get() of control values simpler than events? My
previos proposal had a control->get() method and a ctrl->set() method.
Obviously, the set() is superceded by events. Is the get, too?
What is this for? If you want to implement this then they need to be
events (well, sample accurate), but they sound like a pain to implement.