12 Feb
2006
12 Feb
'06
1:16 a.m.
On 2/12/06, peter <zenadsl6252(a)zen.co.uk> wrote:
On Sun, 2006-02-12 at 14:35 +1100, Loki Davison
wrote:
Yeah, i probably still object to it's presence. What is the point of a
standalone version? What is wrong with just using jack-dssi-host? If
you want a standalone version, you can just have a script,
jack-dssi-host myplugin called myplugin for people to run. Though the
other idea sounds nice. Easy to skin widgets with lots of
functionality are great. Maybe you can merge them into libphat? It's
specifically for that purpose, though i don't know Pete's plans for
it.
Loki
Please, pretty please get rid of the keyboard. If
you want a sexy
keyboard, skin vkeybd don't include a keyboard in your dssi. Apart
from that i actually quite like it.
assuming i ever finish it and it gets used (2 big ifs), it will be used
in the standalone version too and the keyboard was requested.
i always intended it to be optional/hideable anyway (and hidden by
default, it's large enough already even without the keyboard).
do you still object to it's presence even if you don't use or look at
it?
(i prefer to offer the choice myself. pleases most people at the expense
of minor bloat).
ultimately, i'd like the widget itself to be native or skinable, the
same for the knob and to put that and any other useful widgets into a
lib (or merge it with an exiting one) so that other audio apps could use
them.
but i also wanted to have finished it last year so you can take that
with a pinch of salt.
Pete.
======================
paugh on irc.freenode.org in #sweep, #lad
kickback(a)users.sourceforge.net
======================