On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 11:28:42 +0200, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
For example:
(<plugin> stands for the unique name of a plugin)
/<plugin>/addport <name>
/<plugin>/port/<name>/range 0 10
/<plugin>/port/<name>/default 5
/<plugin>/port/<name>/unit octaves
This is a trivial example of course, for a real format we'll have to
think about grouping, port types, etc.
I dont really see the avantage of this - control and description are
seperate tasks, and not even closely related.
OSC is also not equiped to describe the kind of graph structures you need
to describe plugins - you could arbitrarily extend it, but what not use a
language with native graph structures?
- Steve