On 11 May 2007, at 16:13, Florian Schmidt wrote:
I do agree with you that there is such an essential set of features
that
really should be in the core spec, but as it will sort itself out
anyways by
means of evolution, i also consider this problem fixed ;)
I also agree. I agree with Fons that there are "essential" features
missing from LV2, but I don't agree about which ones. However, in the
interests of Just Getting On With It I want the extensions to evolve.
Designing specifications without pretty extensive implementation
experience is fraught (look at LADSPA), this is an unfortunate
catch-22. The IETF and W3C will only standardise things that are
already common practice. I know LAD is not really in that world - no-
one will loose millions of dollars if we mess up - but I'm sure we
all value our time highly.
- Steve