8 Feb
2003
8 Feb
'03
4:04 p.m.
On Sat, Feb 08, 2003 at 07:41:43 +0100, David Olofson
wrote:
I'm starting to agree. I really dislike the idea that the host has to read
a plugin's output control to get extra stuff for a preset. If there really
is extra stuff, let's do it properly. I'm not sure yet that there is a need
for it, so let's just back-burner it?
Tim
As a matter of fact, if you just loop the output
back to the input,
the "LEARN" switch is all you need. Whenever you flip the switch to
"off" the new data would be send back to the input. When you save a
preset, the host would see the connection of the input and go look
for the current value - which it finds on that output.
This is starting to sound like a really nasty hack.