8 Nov
2009
8 Nov
'09
11:44 a.m.
On Sat, 2009-11-07 at 15:37 -0600, Gabriel M. Beddingfield wrote:
Looking at this, people say, "This is good, but
it's kind of a mess at the
moment. Can we get some sort of 'canonical list of extensions' or
/something/ stable for devs to work from?" To which Dave replies, "FUD!
FUD! FUD! Such a list accomplishes nothing!"
Actually I specifically said making a list of "well supported"
extensions was a good idea.
Making a bunch of different "categories" of LV2 support is stupid, and
claiming the extension thing is some apocalyptic disaster with no
evidence is FUD.
Dave *seems* to think that "The
Problem" isn't a problem.
Dave is, at this moment, working on "The Problem" (documentation).
Actions speak louder than words.
-dr