21 Jul
2010
21 Jul
'10
11:30 p.m.
On Wed, 2010-07-21 at 22:23 +0100, Folderol wrote:
On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 17:10:35 -0400
Paul Davis <paul(a)linuxaudiosystems.com> wrote:
Was it natural or 'hyper'-natural?
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 4:58 PM, Ralf Mardorf
<ralf.mardorf(a)alice-dsl.net> wrote:
I remember when 2001 first came out, being totally astonished by the
sequence where the ape-man first uses a bone as a club. There was the
totally realistic effect of a gust of wind moving from the screen to the
rear of the cinema. I've no idea what system was in use, but it
certainly wasn't 2 channel stereo!
@ nonsense and bullshit, where are the examples
that it works?
There is no valid recording with more than 1 or 2 channels, regarding to
a natural impression. Some art projects that didn't try to give a
natural impression are something very, very different.
Most audio engineers still fail regarding to stereo and mono issues. I
wonder about the geniuses who are able to do 5.1 and all the other
stuff.
Please post links to the geniuses work, but call me names.
ralf, you simply don't have any idea what you're talking about, unless
you try to limit your comments to commercially released material. you
made no indication that you intended to use this limitation.
people have been recording with/for ambisonics for nearly 40 years
now. recording with multiple microphones (including things like the
eigenmike http://www.mhacoustics.com/mh_acoustics/Eigenmike_microphone_array.html
which by itself makes your point null and void) is common enough that
sound on sound has articles on it.