13 Jul
2003
13 Jul
'03
10:27 a.m.
On Sat, 2003-07-12 at 22:32, Juhana Sadeharju wrote:
For some reason the shared memory is not a true shared
memory.
The shmserver and shmclient do have the shared memory segment
obtained with the same shmid value, but processes seems to
have their own duplicates of it. I have no other explanation.
I haven't got any problems with shared memory, but afterall, I don't use
the SystemV method (shm* functions) because it sucks. I think the
SystemV IPC stuff sucks as whole. I like to use the "real" POSIX way..
:)
--
Jussi Laako <jussi.laako(a)pp.inet.fi>