29 Apr
2012
29 Apr
'12
6 p.m.
Am Sonntag, den 29.04.2012, 17:51 +0200 schrieb Andreas Kuckartz:
On 29.04.2012 16:41, hermann wrote:
I'm not a lawyer, nor an expert of GPL. I have a understand of GPL,
witch I see validated here, but I cant say for sure that it is the fact.
No, I wouldn't buy those crap, and I didn't know anyone how buy it. But
in a discussion with the provider, he said that he wouldn't provide the
source, also not for regular users if they request it.
This is the second time this guy distribute sticks wich binary s and he
claim that he didn't need to provide the source. That is, what he
understand under the GPL.
greets
hermann
For some time now there is a website witch offer
a USB stick, a
slackware based Audio bundle full with GPL'd software.
I have some discussions with the provider, because he wouldn't make the
source available to his (possible) users, and he wouldn't make them
aware that they have the right to receive the source.
I am irritated by the "(possible)".
Did you or someone else get the binaries from him and then tried to get
the source code or did you try to get the source code first?
Cheers,
Andreas