Hallo,
Thorsten Wilms hat gesagt: // Thorsten Wilms wrote:
Besides widgte-level gui standards another topic for
general usability is terminology. Naming of concepts
like sessions, banks, presets, patches and so on.
Puh, that will be a hard one, as audio applications tend to be very
different, not only in terminology. Pd doesn't know "sessions" or
"bank", Ardour doesn't now "messages" or "bang"s, AMS
doesn't know
about "tracks", all because those things aren't used by them. One
could try to make the naming in similar apps the same, like in Ardour
and MuSE, but they already are most of the time.
Of special interest to me is naming and structure of
the different organizational levels of samplers.
I have to ask: what is a sampler to you?
And a specific questions: what is thought to be the
best approach to allow both having multiple samples
with greatly varying setups of filters/amps/etc
(drumkits) and multiple samples for chromatic
instruments with smooth changes of filter/amp/etc
settings?
I sincerly don't understand what you are talking about here. ;(
Maybe you could explain with an example? But maybe we just think
different when thinking of samplers...
Ciao
--
Frank Barknecht _ ______footils.org__