14 Jan
2004
14 Jan
'04
5:03 p.m.
On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 06:42:58PM +0000, Mike Rawes wrote:
With the exception of samples or other 'blob'
data (e.g. IR impulses), I'm
fairly confident that a good modular could be constructed with LADSPA as it is.
I'm prepared to be proved wrong though!
You're probably right about this. But if I implement all I need using only the
existing LADSPA interfaces, then at least one of the the following would be
true:
- the resulting modules would be technically compliant with the standard, but
completely useless outside the AMS host, as there would be a lot of ports that
carry AMS-specific data.
- or the LADSPA compliant part would only contain *part* of a module (i.e. only
the audio processing), and in that case nothing is gained, as LADSPA is used
only as an internal interface. In fact this would just complicate module
inplementation.
--
Fons