24 Jan
2010
24 Jan
'10
2:23 p.m.
Am Sonntag, den 24.01.2010, 18:56 +0100 schrieb fons(a)kokkinizita.net:
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 06:43:22PM +0100, hermann
wrote:
the
I mean less, it will be nice if we could choose to correct less then a
half semitone, 0.1 or 0.2 for example, and let the rest untouched.
Not every tone needs to be in tune, sometimes, . . .
Just as suggestion.
I haven d look at the source, so I dont know if that will introduce more
CPU usage, for now, jretune needs just 3% of my
CPU Info Intel Pentium 4 512 KB cache flags( sse2 ) clocked at
[ 2591.849 MHz ]
regards hermann
Am Sonntag, den 24.01.2010, 00:37 +0100 schrieb
fons(a)kokkinizita.net:
If you
want to test this just drop me a line to get
the sources.
My first tests:
It's excellent as a guitar tuner, nice and simple to use.
As retuner, it sounds a bit muddy when the tone comes out of tune, pitch wipe up and down like a chorus effect, when
the tone comes
near
enough to a tune it work's nice and fast to
correct the last missing
semitones. May a selection for the working (semi tone) range could
be
helpful, to let the tones, witch are to far from
any tune, alone, or
to
cut them away.
If you keep all notes enabled the correction will never be
more than half a semitone. Jretune is not supposed to do
much more - e.g. changing the notes of a melody. Correcting more will always produce a colouration of
the
voice - this is because not only the pitch is retuned,
but the spectrum (formants) also move up or down.
Ciao,
--
FA