2 Aug
2012
2 Aug
'12
6:40 p.m.
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 12:02 PM, David Robillard <d(a)drobilla.net> wrote:
On Thu, 2012-08-02 at 11:28 -0400, Paul Davis wrote:
Ah, yes that would make a certain amount of sense if we called it from the
jack thread, somehow.
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 10:46 AM, David Robillard <d(a)drobilla.net>
wrote:
Is there a reason Jack can't do this for everything? I am not
really
keen on putting a bunch of mysterious assembler crap in a host
meant to
be a relatively clean example, and it's even worse to make
plugins have
to do this...
JACK doesn't get a chance to handle the output of a plugin until the
host hands it over to JACK and the process cycle ends. Just have a
reverb plugin outputting denormals and then have the host apply a gain
value and boom .. JACK can't play a role in that signal flow.
I mean set the flush-to-zero flag (and/or any other processor state
stuff required).