4 Feb
2008
4 Feb
'08
12:03 p.m.
On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 03:40:12PM +0000, Bob Ham wrote:
It's none of those, and it's crippled.
People who think that calling one (1, uno) function is a problem
should not be writing any form of applications, because they won't
get very far. Typically you need tens, hundreds, thousands. Raising
sheep may be a better occupation for them.
I will respect the opinions, tastes, and personal preferences of anyone
who demonstrates a minimal amount of engagement, but _not_ of someone who
is so blatantly lazy as you suggest (I don't mean you, but the people you
refer to), and stupid enough to admit it.
Ciao,
--
FA
Laboratorio di Acustica ed Elettroacustica
Parma, Italia
Lascia la spina, cogli la rosa.
On Mon, 2008-02-04 at 15:32 +0100, Fons Adriaensen
wrote:
In other
words, ** you could write this function today **.
The functionality you want does not require any changes
to jack.
The problem is, you're still going to get client authors who say "Well,
I have to implement insanely-annoying-automatic-port-connection because
I have to cater for the people who don't use $your_system" By bringing
autoconnection into JACK itself, there's a standardised, authorised,
proven, approved method.