28 Oct
2002
28 Oct
'02
9:25 a.m.
Paul Winkler wrote:
i've been using my audio/midi processor for this one. since
it's only ladspa fx, inverters and hipasses, and since i've
ripped the hipass filter coefficient calculation from
ecasound (thanks kai!), it is, as steve put it, 'mathematically
equivalent' to the ecasound command line steve posted (with the
above modifications).
for the recording, the output of '-el:unmatched' is written
straight to the disk, there's really nothing analog involved
after the signal enters the box. huge :)
On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 02:41:08AM +0100, Tim Goetze
wrote:
yes, it's passive, two humbuckers. it's going through the
mixer first, the signal's not strong enough to go AD directly.
playing to the control out instead of through the box, the
vol pot sensitivity is what you expect.
make that pref 200 Hz for me. this and the sine
shaper at .4, and
tell you what, this sounds very much like, but in fact better to
me than the sound i play 90% of the time on the real thing. only
drawback is it becomes faint far too quick when turning the vol
down at the guitar, the compression woe.
how are you plugging in your guitar?
if it's a guitar with passive electronics and you're going
straight to the A/D converter, i'd expect it to be
overly sensitive to the volume control. i've made
a quick recording of what this sounds like:
http://quitte.de/easy.mp3
Nice!
is this with ecasound?
how did you record it - straight from ecasound, or piping
back out to a speaker / microphone? I want to get a chance to try this for myself :(
(too busy)
ditch those web pages! it's only money ... ;)
tim