7 Dec
2002
7 Dec
'02
8:11 p.m.
On Sunday 08 December 2002 00.52, Steve Harris wrote:
On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 12:03:14 +0100, David Olofson
wrote:
Well, I don't think that can be avoided... There aren't enough
"expendable" features in LADSPA that it would make up for the new
features, by far.
//David Olofson - Programmer, Composer, Open Source Advocate
.- The Return of Audiality! --------------------------------.
| Free/Open Source Audio Engine for use in Games or Studio. |
| RT and off-line synth. Scripting. Sample accurate timing. |
`---------------------------> http://olofson.net/audiality -'
.- M A I A -------------------------------------------------.
| The Multimedia Application Integration Architecture |
`----------------------------> http://www.linuxdj.com/maia -'
--- http://olofson.net --- http://www.reologica.se ---
Are we going to have LADSPA, and soon OAPI (or
whatever it'll be)
- and in a year or two, another API, effectively merging LADSPA
and OAPI?
Why? What is it that LADSPA does that would be so complicated
that an instrument API must not support it?
Nothing, OAPI or whatever will be a superset I imagine, but that
implies that LADSPA will still be simpler.